Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 December 18
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
December 18
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Escriptircinfo.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Eckstasy (notify | contribs).
- This is unused and has no apparent use. Miami33139 (talk) 00:21, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ZasetsuChitenCDDVDMisono.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Benniebop1991 (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences ( her pose while sitting) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 10:28, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:FaithNoMore-LiveAtTheBrixtonAcademy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by AbsoluteZero (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences (image cropped is the major difference ) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 10:32, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:YallaChant2.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Underneath-it-All (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences ( colouring changed a bit and the text block added) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 10:34, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ya Habayeb-1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MuzikJunky (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences (border changed to a blue patterned one and text changed, but the central image kept the same ) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 10:35, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This is meant to distinguish the EMI-distributed pressing from the plain-vanilla Relax-In International pressing. It should be there, especially for record collectors. Peace. —MuzikJunky (talk) 08:33, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- We can adequately distinguish between the two with text describing the difference. If record collectors want to see the alternate covers they can search through google. Wikipedia is not an image repository - Peripitus (Talk) 23:48, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Y Sigue La Mata Dando 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jaespinoza (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences ( top and bottom-right banners added) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 10:37, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Let's do it. I already deleted the image from the article and expanded the lead section with the information included on the second album cover. Jaespinoza (talk) 20:33, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kylie X - Special Edition.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mirrored Love (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences ( basically the background changed to white) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 10:48, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I am going to put it back up because this is the official cover of the special edition wether you think by changing the background and adding effects to the image is legit or not this is the offical cover and it deserves place in the artical. The image also does not, in any shape or form, deflect from the artical. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mirrored Love (talk • contribs) 00:05, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wrong Turn Score Soundtrack.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Billy4kate (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences ( image desaturated and slightly cropped) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 10:50, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wrong Part 2 Single Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ryan-S79 (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences ( image parts and text just rearranged) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 10:51, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Amanda Lear - Amour Toujours.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dreamer.se (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences (image desaturated) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 10:52, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wish I pt2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Billy4kate (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences ( image cropped and the text box at the top added) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 10:54, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Waitingforsantaclaus.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Anrod (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences (text changed - this is already described in the article ) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 10:56, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jon Foreman Winter EP.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Joberooni (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences (even the text says "with slight variations" ) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 10:56, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Whyareyoulookinggrave-collectors-Mew.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cavie78 (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences (head rotated a bit - not much else ) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 10:57, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Deep Purple - WDWTWA-remastered.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dtones (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences (background changed to black and the image made a bit sharper ) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 10:59, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Skunk anansie weak.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stoosh (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 11:00, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Uproot The Ingredients.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mwtoews (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that we have here for no discernable reason I can see. Adds nothing significant to reader's understanding and abjectly fails WP:NFCC#8. Could easily be replaced with text describing, the black bit, the white bit and the other white bits. Image fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with text. Peripitus (Talk) 11:02, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Would you apply the same rational on this one? Although the album art is "simple", the fonts and exact layout cannot be reproduced in pure HTML across different browsers (also there are non-text elements too, such as the record label logo). All the appropriate non-free rational is provided, so I'm not sure what the motivation is here. +mt 18:23, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The motivation is the the motto ("The Free Encyclopedia") in the top left of this screen. What significant increase in understanding of the topic does seeing this image on Wikipedia bring to the reader ? None that I can see - Peripitus (Talk) 23:51, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bardo Pond - US Tour EP.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Thom (notify | contribs).
- Back cover of an EP that we are hosting for no compelling reason. Could easily be described with text and I cannot see what, of significance, this adds to reader's understanding - fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 11:03, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Underneath-remixes.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DanBLOO (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences ( the word "remixes" added) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 11:07, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete concur with Peripitus. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:40, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ultra Beatdown.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Download (notify | contribs).
- non-free image that is simple enough to be described with text alone. It is simply "the band's logo on a black background with the album title below". As the logo is on the other non-free image in the article, reader's are not going to be unable to visualise this. Image fails WP:NFCC#1, 3a and 8 Peripitus (Talk) 11:10, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences ( a few people moved around in the shot) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 11:11, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:JoJo -Japan-.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hotdate240 (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences ( colour changed) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 11:25, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned photo of a wikipedian. No encyclopedic use. Peripitus (Talk) 11:32, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:GatewaymallSTLhallway.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DaronDierkes (notify | contribs).
- Doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding. PhilKnight (talk) 12:01, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The gateway mall conservancy went live today[1], and I was told by them that I may take any of their photos and use them as creative commons. I guess that means this picture should not be listed as fair use, but as CC. The Hallway feature is the unifying feature of the mall, and should be included on the page in some form. You may note on the conservancy's website that it is the very first tab, and the rendering is the strongest conveyor of the concept. DaronDierkes (talk) 01:25, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This image is still copyrighted, so based on on what you're saying, it should be deleted. PhilKnight (talk) 11:55, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Graham Greene.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by John_Kenney (notify | contribs).
- Book cover use in bio infobox. PhilKnight (talk) 12:13, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sigh. I'm glad to see people are improving wikipedia by making sure we remove images that are never going to get wikipedia in trouble. Good work as always, copyrighted image patrol! john k (talk) 23:00, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Frank Zappa Joe's Garage Act I.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ibaranoff24 (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences ( not much really) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 12:15, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:All that I got is you CD back.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Endlessdan (notify | contribs).
- Article already has the front of the album artwork. We need to see the back....because.......sorry but can't think of a reason. Image fails to add significantly to reader's understanding and so does not pass WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 12:19, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:All that i got is you vinyl.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Endlessdan (notify | contribs).
- Article already has the front of the album artwork. We need to see the vynal insert....because.......sorry but can't think of a reason. Image fails to add significantly to reader's understanding and so does not pass WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 12:20, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:String Dustin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Airproofing (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences ( text only) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 12:21, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This is of interest to those who follow discographies. The original was significant of the time period and the re-issue is a modernized version. The image itself illustrates that fact. Airproofing (talk) 16:38, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- How does that address any of the deletion points I have raised ? The original may be significant but the modernised version is not - find a single reliable source discussing the differences ..... I can see none - Peripitus (Talk) 23:53, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete as no case made for retention. Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:07, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Purepopfornowpeople.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by CenozoicEra (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences (people, clothing and colours shuffled around ) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 12:22, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences (very little ) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a). Also has a grossly insufficient rationale for use Peripitus (Talk) 12:24, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Nobody saw any need to add a free image during the several years that it was possible to do so therefore I find it impossible to believe that this can meet all of WP:NFCC as required. Possibly replaceable, certainly not adding anything to the reader's understanding. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sir Noel Power.jpg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Clithering (notify | contribs).
- non-free image without a clear source. The subject was a widely photographed public figure and it seems clear that a free image could be obtained of him, though it may take some effort. Displaying his appearance at a different time of his career, rather than the portion that this image depicts, is not going to significantly harm reader's understanding of his biography. Image fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with a free image ( I can see many images of him on the web - just go and ask the owners if they will release under free licences ) Peripitus (Talk) 12:32, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Object. The photo suitably falls into the category of fair-use photo. Sir Noel was widely remembered as Chief Justice of Hong Kong. A photo of him dressing in judicial robe greatly helps reader identify him as a judge. Moreover, effort has been made but no free image of him has been found.--Clithering (talk) 13:11, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- From what I can see on the web he is also well remembered for his work in Brunei, and in this capacity I can see a lot of images of him. We must credit reader's with the imagination to see him one way and understand the article regardless of the clothes he is wearing. - Peripitus (Talk) 22:17, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Firstly, I can't see there are "many images of him on the web" (There are only four relevent images found by typing "Sir Noel Power" in Google). Secondly, I don't see how other images of him in leisure wear taken in elsewhere can help reader "remember his work in Brunei". Thirdly, none of his photo on the web is copyright-free. I don't see why the present photo must not be used, why the photo does not fall under the definition of fair use, and why it is nominated for speedy deletion. --Clithering (talk) 09:50, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- From what I can see on the web he is also well remembered for his work in Brunei, and in this capacity I can see a lot of images of him. We must credit reader's with the imagination to see him one way and understand the article regardless of the clothes he is wearing. - Peripitus (Talk) 22:17, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Object. The photo suitably falls into the category of fair-use photo. Sir Noel was widely remembered as Chief Justice of Hong Kong. A photo of him dressing in judicial robe greatly helps reader identify him as a judge. Moreover, effort has been made but no free image of him has been found.--Clithering (talk) 13:11, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NFCC#1: replaceable non-free image. — Bility (talk) 20:47, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep He's dead. We can't just go out and take another picture of him. That's the usual test of NFCC #1. Jheald (talk) 23:32, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. WP:NFCC #1 and #8 not met. Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:10, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Madonna-Confessions-Tour-poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Legolas2186 (notify | contribs).
- non-free poster of a tour in an article that is replete with free images - any of which could be used in the infobox rather than this. The image is not discussed at length in the article, in fact I cannot find that it is even mentioned. Purely decorative use that does not significantly increase reader's understanding. Image fails WP:NFCC#8 and its use could easily be covered by one of the free image - it also fails to meet WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 12:36, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Not to state WP:WAX, but do you think that all posters, album covers, single covers, film posters, book covers are discussed in the articles? The answer is no. They are present because they are necessary and useful. The image present in the poster is definitely not from the tour and free alternative won't be found for it as it is created specifically for the promotion of the tour. --Legolas (talk2me) 03:35, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Useful is insufficient to meet the non-free requirements here and "necessary" must usually be demonstrated. Why exactly is this image necessary to significantly increase reader's understanding ? - Peripitus (Talk) 03:59, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Because it visually denotes the purpose of a poster. That is to promote the tour. In this case the promotion has been discussed including the ticket sales and media notability. Also, the development of the poster, including where the image was taken is present in the article, which is the main criteria for WP:NFCC#8. Hence it doesnot fail in any way.--Legolas (talk2me) 10:13, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Useful is insufficient to meet the non-free requirements here and "necessary" must usually be demonstrated. Why exactly is this image necessary to significantly increase reader's understanding ? - Peripitus (Talk) 03:59, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As stated above. --Legolas (talk2me) 03:35, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep with adequate rationale - like a book cover is/can be a single defining image of the tour. Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:48, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, textbook NFCC#8 failure as the image does not add to readers' understanding of the article. Stifle (talk) 09:23, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- But it does increase the understanding due to the fact that it is from a different performance by the artist, and not related to the tour performances at all. --Legolas (talk2me) 12:10, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jr1 10 2007 naslovna b no1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by LukaP (notify | contribs).
- non-free image used as decoration in an airline article. While the existance of the depicted magazine is mentioned, it's appearance is not either discussed at length or even mentioned in passing. Image does not significantly add to reader's understanding and fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 12:38, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. No source. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Venegas.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).
- No evidence the author of this image died more than 50 years ago (what would be 1 year after taking this doomed photo). The original copyright holder has not been tracked down. The image was just downloaded from a website that uses many images from many sources without attributing them, although stating that these images "are obtained from several image providers who are free on the Internet for nonprofit educational projects" [2] (translation by google). Damiens.rf 13:17, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep- I asked MBisanz and Shell Kinney two respected OTRS members their opinion in regard to this image. MBisanz recommended that {{PD-old-50}} be used. Shell Kinney stated the following "Now the image itself; since it is most likely from around 1948 when he was boxing in the Olympics, it may not have fallen into the public domain yet. I think though that this image an excellent candidate for fair-use. The image is historical (his time in the Olympics, first time for Puerto Rico), nothing similar could be taken (he is no longer in the Olympics and deceased in any case) and the article discusses his participation in the Olympics in detail, I believe it satisfies all the fair-use criteria." I also believe that the image could be used as fair use. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:33, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't be disingenuous. You actually asked 3 users: MBisanz[3], Shell Kinney[4] and Me[5]. I pointed you out why images from that source can't be freely used[6], Shell Kinney said we need to track down the original source before claiming PD or fair use[7] and MBisanz simply said "You should use {{PD-old-50}}"[8]. You conveniently choose the most attractive reply (MBisanz's) and ignored the concerns raised by the the others. I'm getting tired of you trickeries for fostering the use of policy-infringing images. --Damiens.rf 21:16, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - What is your problem with me Damien? Yes, I did ask you, but you did not help any. You always seem to take on an offensive stance when dealing with me. Stop turning these issues into a personal interaction between you and I. You claim that you are getting tired of me, however I am also getting tired of the way you direct yourself towards me. I have tried to deal with you in the most civil of ways despite your past insults, however your actions towards my person leaves a lot to be desired. Do not get personal and let this take it's course. Sometimes it is impossible to determine the copyright of an image and you know that. That is why we have this: {{Non-free fair use in}} and a fair-use criteria. I will post on the image the rationale for it's taking into consideration the fair-use criteria. Thank you Tony the Marine (talk) 02:41, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
{
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Tank Game Icon.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Magicboker (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 13:46, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Silvermead family tree.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Munkee madness (notify | contribs).
- Orphan; previously PRODed by User:Munkee madness, the editor who upload the file. Cnilep (talk) 17:35, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- UE, OR, LQ, use not stated. -FASTILY (TALK) 20:59, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Have fun with that...I've moved it to the commons. --nsaum75¡שיחת! 00:32, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Unencyclopedic picture of a drunk college student passed out. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:02, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Pearl Harbor2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Frizbeeaj (notify | contribs).
- Unencyclopedic picture of a drunk college student passed out; this one's a bit smaller than the other. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:02, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Dannyjakeatscarletts.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gungadin (notify | contribs).
- Nonfree image (beyond the first for identification) being used to decorate article on a fictional character. An image of two guys sitting at a table in a bar is not particularly iconic, and is replaceable by text alone. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:06, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hazara pioneer badge.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hazaraboyz (notify | contribs).
- OR, LQ, use not stated -FASTILY (TALK) 21:06, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Image creator is currently blocked and cannot post here. See User_talk:Hazaraboyz. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 21:13, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:DANNY JAKE 2006.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gungadin (notify | contribs).
- Nonfree image (beyond the first for identification) being used to decorate article on fictional characters. The fact that Person A shot Person B and was then distraught about it can be described in text, and the image is not particularly iconic. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:07, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Danny's breakdown.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gungadin (notify | contribs).
- Nonfree image (beyond the first for identification) being used to decorate article on a fictional character. Completely replaceable by text; a man crying is not a particularly iconic image. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:09, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Based on {{PD-Cuba}} I don't see how a picture of this 1985 coin could be anything other than a derivative image. There's no specific mention of Cuban currency at commons:Commons:Currency to consider and nobody commenting here has given a good reason for supposing that there is an exception to the usual PD-Cuba rules forin the case of currency. Since this is a derivative work and since the use of non-free content for this purpose is specifically disallowed (see WP:NFCI, point 3), there doesn't appear to be any way to retain this image. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:37, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Peso.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mike_Searson (notify | contribs).
- cuban government works are under perpetual copyright, see {{PD-Cuba}} Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:39, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually now that I look at it, I'm not 100% sure. I made that template a while ago. I put the govt thing there because I thought a government would be a "persona jurídica" (see the talk page for the text of the law in Spanish) but I'm not 100% sure. The page legal person lists states as an example of a legal person, but I guess it would depend on the jurisdiction. Any native spanish speakers with some legal background want to chime in? :) Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:43, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I would like to see concrete proof that images of Cuban coins are copyrighted. I am not at all convinced by the "government works" argument. In the UK, banknotes are copyrighted (I'm not sure about coins) but this is not because they are government works. They are copyrighted by The Bank of England, which is independent of the Government. I know we are discussing an image of a Cuban coin, but the copyright status of this image can not be assumed to fall fall under a perpetual copyright owned by the Cuban government. Graham Colm Talk 22:08, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- PS Which talk page? Please provide the link. Graham Colm Talk 22:10, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- PPS What is the status of the images in this article Cuban peso? Graham Colm Talk 22:24, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It is also a picture of a commemorative coin, taken by me, outside of Cuba and not intended as currency. I hope Fidel doesn't send a Hit Squad after me now.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 00:10, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- PPS What is the status of the images in this article Cuban peso? Graham Colm Talk 22:24, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- PS Which talk page? Please provide the link. Graham Colm Talk 22:10, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I would like to see concrete proof that images of Cuban coins are copyrighted. I am not at all convinced by the "government works" argument. In the UK, banknotes are copyrighted (I'm not sure about coins) but this is not because they are government works. They are copyrighted by The Bank of England, which is independent of the Government. I know we are discussing an image of a Cuban coin, but the copyright status of this image can not be assumed to fall fall under a perpetual copyright owned by the Cuban government. Graham Colm Talk 22:08, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Talk page is Template talk:PD-Cuba. Anyways this is a creative work made in 1985. Even if it were made by a private citizen it would still be copyrighted in Cuba. Do you have any argument for why this would be PD now? Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:45, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see how it is not PD. It is a photograph of a coin, taken by me, not the Cuban government. By your own admission, you are not 100% sure, either. If I were to take a picture of a building built in Cuba by the government, would they claim that as the same?--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 16:50, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The 1977 Cuban copyright Act has this to say regarding limitations of copyright. Chapter 8, Section 1a, allows use "for the purposes of education, information, criticism, illustration" but stipulates that the author's name and source must be given. Section 1c says, "to reproduce by any means, except those involving direct contact with the surface, a work of art on permanent display in public except those in exhibitions in museums". Article 45 says, "In the case of a work published anonymously, or under a pseudonym, the copyright is valid for twenty years after its first publication." I am not expert on Cuban copyright law, but it I think it would be helpful to discover who designed the coin. If this is not possible I think the Article 45 might be applicable. Having said this, because Wikipedia is a non-profit making, educational organisation, use of this image does not seem to contravene Cuban copyright laws. Graham Colm Talk 17:20, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll see if I can find that out, Graham, about the artist. I have a feeling it will be tough as I know how certain countries are about recognizing individual achievement. Still, in researching this I have found numerous photos of Cuban coins in question on commercial sites (including another Cuban peso with a more realistic picture of the iguana than the one I have); knowing how the Cuban government is about money, and having to pay them personally for flying within their airspace and receiving assorted nastygrams; I would think if this was a real issue these coin vendors would not be doing it. Also the bulk of coin related articles on wikipedia would have no pictures. I guess someone has to keep wikipedia safe from the likes of me, a self-proclaimed hater of Family Guy!--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 17:37, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Nice, thanks for cocking up my article.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 22:24, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The 1977 Cuban copyright Act has this to say regarding limitations of copyright. Chapter 8, Section 1a, allows use "for the purposes of education, information, criticism, illustration" but stipulates that the author's name and source must be given. Section 1c says, "to reproduce by any means, except those involving direct contact with the surface, a work of art on permanent display in public except those in exhibitions in museums". Article 45 says, "In the case of a work published anonymously, or under a pseudonym, the copyright is valid for twenty years after its first publication." I am not expert on Cuban copyright law, but it I think it would be helpful to discover who designed the coin. If this is not possible I think the Article 45 might be applicable. Having said this, because Wikipedia is a non-profit making, educational organisation, use of this image does not seem to contravene Cuban copyright laws. Graham Colm Talk 17:20, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see how it is not PD. It is a photograph of a coin, taken by me, not the Cuban government. By your own admission, you are not 100% sure, either. If I were to take a picture of a building built in Cuba by the government, would they claim that as the same?--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 16:50, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Per WP:NFCC#3a. Unnecessary use of non-free image to illustrate deceased subject of article when another non-free image (File:Yokoi.jpg) is already in use. Also per WP:NFCC#8. — Bility (talk) 22:13, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Xerox NoteTaker.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ProhibitOnions (notify | contribs).
- Doesn't meet criteria for fair use. The image is also watermarked and said watermark can't be removed without violating the terms of the copyright holder's license, per their terms of use (images may be copied or distributed provided each and every such image bears the following credit line: "Image courtesy of Computer History Museum."). This is also an easily replaceable image, as the subject of the image still exists to be photographed. — Bility (talk) 22:48, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, plenty of other images on Chrysler Crossfire. — Bility (talk) 23:03, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment is the "digital watermark" the burned-in timestamp? 76.66.194.220 (talk) 07:16, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Commons, if possible, since it claims to be no copyright PD. 76.66.194.220 (talk) 07:16, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:China Crisis - Difficult Shapes-cover2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Brambo (notify | contribs).
- Alternate album cover. Fails WP:NFCC#3 as multiple non-free files are being used when one would suffice. This image is not significantly different from the main image to justify its use. — ξxplicit 23:48, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.